E-ISSN 1858-8360 | ISSN 0256-4408
 

Editorial & Peer Review Process



1. Submission of Paper

The corresponding or submitting author submits the paper to the journal. This is usually via an online system. Occasionally, the journal may accept submissions by email.

2. Editorial Office Assessment

The staff at Editorial Office checks the paper’s composition and arrangement against the journal’s Author Guidelines to make sure that it includes the required sections and stylizations. The quality of the paper is not assessed at this point, but similarity check is performed to detect any possible plagiarism or redundant submission.

3. Appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief

The editor(s) checks that the paper is appropriate for the journal and is sufficiently original and interesting. If not, the paper may be rejected without being reviewed any further.

4. EIC Assigns an Associate Editor (AE) or Section Editor (where available)

The journal has Associate Editors and section editors who handle the peer review. They are assigned at this stage.

5. Invitation to Reviewers

The handling editor sends invitations to individuals he or she believes would be appropriate reviewers. As responses are received, further invitations are issued, if necessary, until the required number of acceptances is obtained – commonly this is 2, but may vary depending upon the submission type.

6. Response to Invitations

Potential reviewers consider the invitation against their own expertise, conflicts of interest and availability. They then accept or decline. If possible, when declining, they might also suggest alternative reviewers.

7. Review is Conducted

The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewer may feel comfortable rejecting the paper without further work. Otherwise they will read the paper several more times, taking notes so as to build a detailed point-by-point review. The review is then submitted to the journal, with a recommendation to accept or reject it – or else with a request for revision (usually flagged as either major or minor) before it is reconsidered.

8. Journal Evaluates the Reviews

The handling editor considers all the returned reviews before making an overall decision. If the reviews differ widely, the editor may invite an additional reviewer so as to get an extra opinion before making a decision.

9. The Decision is Communicated

The editor (or Editorial Office) sends a decision email to the author including any relevant reviewer comments. These comments are anonymous as the journal follows a double-blind peer review policy.

10. Next Steps

If accepted, the paper is sent to production. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor includes constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. At this point, reviewers may also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. If the paper was sent back for revision, the reviewers should expect to receive a new version, unless they have opted out of further participation. However, where only minor changes were requested this follow-up review might be done by the handling editor.



Most Viewed Articles
  • Blood tests are not always helpful in predicting bacterial meningitis in children. [eng]
    Taha I Yousif; Katie O'Reilly; Montasser Nadeem
    Sudan J Paed. 2016; 16(2): 77-79
    » Abstract

  • Evaluation of Science. [eng]
    Adnan Mahmmood Usmani; Sultan Ayoub Meo
    Sudan J Paed. 2011; 11(1): 6-7
    » Abstract

  • Commitment to the wellbeing of children worldwide. [eng]
    Mustafa Abdalla M Salih; Satti Abdelrahim Satti
    Sudan J Paed. 2011; 11(2): 4-5
    » Abstract

  • X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets (PHEX mutation): A case report and literature review. [eng]
    Badi Alenazi; M A Maleque Molla; Abdullah Alshaya; Mahmoud Saleh
    Sudan J Paed. 2017; 17(1): 61-65
    » Abstract

  • About the Cover. [eng]

    Sudan J Paed. 2016; 16(2): i-i
    » Abstract

  • Four decades of the Sudanese Journal of Paediatrics and milstones. [eng]
    Mustafa Abdalla M Salih; Mohammed Osman Swar
    Sudan J Paed. 2017; 17(1): 5-9
    » Abstract

  • The Editors of Sudanese Journal of Paediatrics would like to thank. [eng]

    Sudan J Paed. 2016; 16(2): 99-99
    » Abstract

  • Bartter syndrome associated with nephropathic cystinosis. [eng]
    Nader M Osman; Ali Al Sanosi
    Sudan J Paed. 2016; 16(2): 93-98
    » Abstract

  • The nature and prevalence of psychiatric disorders in a Sudanese juvenile correctional facility. [eng]
    Ayaa Siddig Abdelrahman Ali; Mohamed Ali Awadelkarim
    Sudan J Paed. 2016; 16(2): 28-40
    » Abstract

  • A new horizon for the Sudanese Journal of Paediatrics. [eng]
    Mustafa Abdalla M Salih; Satti Abdelrahim Satti
    Sudan J Paed. 2011; 11(1): 4-5
    » Abstract

  • Most Downloaded
  • Inborn errors of metabolism associated with hyperglycaemic ketoacidosis and diabetes mellitus: narrative review
    Majid Alfadhel, Amir Babiker
    Sudan J Paed. 2018; 18(1): 10-23
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/SJP.2018.1.3

  • Why mothers are not exclusively breast feeding their babies till 6 months of age? Knowledge and practices data from two large cities of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
    Hafsa Raheel, Shabana Tharkar
    Sudan J Paed. 2018; 18(1): 28-38
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/SJP.2018.1.5

  • Burosumab - a new drug to treat hypophosphatemic rickets
    Stepan Kutilek, Amir Babiker, Badi Alenazi
    Sudan J Paed. 2017; 17(2): 71-73
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/SJP.2017.2.11

  • Article authored by three generations: International lifetime commitment to child health
    Mustafa Abdalla M Salih, Mohammed Osman Swar
    Sudan J Paed. 2017; 17(2): 5-10
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/SJP.2017.2.1

  • Ethical considerations about changing parental attitude towards end-of-life care in twins with lethal disease
    Mohamad-Hani Temsah
    Sudan J Paed. 2018; 18(1): 76-82
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/SJP.2018.1.11

  • Severe desquamation in Kawasaki disease: Is it somehow protective?
    Jubran Theeb Alqanatish, Amir Babiker
    Sudan J Paed. 2017; 17(2): 56-59
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/SJP.2017.2.7

  • Congenital brain malformations in Sudanese children: an outpatient-based study
    Inaam Noureldyme Mohammed, Soad Abdalaziz Suliman, Maha A Elseed, Ahlam Abdalrhman Hamed, Mohamed Osman Babiker, Shaimaa Osman Taha
    Sudan J Paed. 2018; 18(1): 48-56
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/SJP.2018.1.7

  • Anti-diabetic medications: How to make a choice?
    Amir Babiker, Mohammed Al Dubayee
    Sudan J Paed. 2017; 17(2): 11-20
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/SJP.2017.2.12

  • Medical education and services in an extreme environment
    Mustafa Abdalla M. Salih, Mohammed Osman Swar
    Sudan J Paed. 2018; 18(1): 2-5
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/SJP.2018.1.1

  • Presacral Neuroblastoma in an 11 months old infant
    Sunil Malik, Sonal Saran, Annu Kharbanda
    Sudan J Paed. 2018; 18(1): 87-89
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/SJP.2018.1.14

  • Most Cited Articles
  • Commitment to the wellbeing of children worldwide. [eng]
    Mustafa Abdalla M Salih; Satti Abdelrahim Satti
    Sudan J Paed. 2011; 11(2): 4-5
    » Abstract
    Cited : 4 times [Click to see citing articles]

  • Evaluation of Science. [eng]
    Adnan Mahmmood Usmani; Sultan Ayoub Meo
    Sudan J Paed. 2011; 11(1): 6-7
    » Abstract
    Cited : 1 time [Click to see citing article]

  • Burosumab - a new drug to treat hypophosphatemic rickets
    Stepan Kutilek, Amir Babiker, Badi Alenazi
    Sudan J Paed. 2017; 17(2): 71-73
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/SJP.2017.2.11
    Cited : 1 time [Click to see citing article]